Sample Analysis Report
| Client | Maria T. |
| Property | Sherman Oaks, CA (City of Los Angeles) |
| Project type | Pool renovation — replaster, tile, coping, equipment |
| Bids analyzed | 3 — Bid A, Bid B, Bid C |
| Report date | July 2026 |
| Tier | Standard Analysis |
Executive Summary
Three bids were submitted for a pool renovation at a Sherman Oaks property in the City of Los Angeles. Bid A is the highest at $118,500 and the most complete in scope. Bid C is the lowest at $84,900 but carries the most significant scope gaps and financial exposure. None of the three bids address permits, which are required for this scope of work. No bid specifies shell construction method or PSI. Equipment specifications are absent or incomplete across all three bids.
Pricing
Bid A — $118,500
Warranty — As Stated in This Document
| Item Covered | Duration | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Pool plaster, tile, coping — labor | 2 years | Contractor |
| Pool equipment — manufacturer | Per manufacturer documentation | Manufacturer |
| Drainage work | Not stated in this document | — |
Bid B — $97,400
Warranty — As Stated in This Document
| Item Covered | Duration | Source |
|---|---|---|
| All items | Not stated in this document | — |
No warranty language is present in this bid document.
Bid C — $84,900
Warranty — As Stated in This Document
| Item Covered | Duration | Source |
|---|---|---|
| All items | Not stated in this document | — |
No warranty language is present in this bid document.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Scope Item | Bid A | Bid B | Bid C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total price | $118,500 | $97,400 | $84,900 |
| Replaster | ✓ Included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Retile | ✓ Included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Coping | ✓ Included | ✓ Included | ⚠ Unclear |
| Equipment replacement | ✓ Included | ⚠ Partial | ✗ Not addressed |
| Paver hardscape | ✓ Included | ✓ Included | ✗ Not included |
| Permits addressed | ✗ Not addressed | ✗ Not addressed | ✗ Not addressed |
| Warranty — labor | ✓ 2 years | ✗ Not stated | ✗ Not stated |
| Deposit | ✓ $1,000 | ✓ $1,000 | ✗ $8,490 |
| Equipment specified | ⚠ Partial | ⚠ Partial | ✗ Not specified |
| Shell PSI stated | ✗ Not stated | ✗ Not stated | ✗ Not stated |
Bid A is the most complete and most expensive. Bid B offers comparable scope at a significant discount, though warranty language is absent from the document entirely. Bid C covers materially less scope — a direct price comparison is not possible until scope parity is confirmed. The deposit stated in Bid C exceeds the California legal cap. Permits are not addressed in any of the three bids. Bid Clarity does not recommend which bid to choose — these findings are presented to help the client make an informed decision.
Next Steps
Send these questions to each contractor before signing. They are professional, neutral, and tied directly to findings in this report.
Get a complete report on your contractor bids — delivered within 24 to 48 hours.
See packages from $185